PTQ Q1 2024 Issue

Temperature values sensed by CTLS (WIKA) just two months after installation

Time stamp

∆ P - kPa 7.1 kPa

TC/PYRO

IR Survey ºC

CTLSºC

Observation

1

Feb-11, 5:30pm

1. 203 2. 206 3. 208 4. 203 5. 201 6. 208 1. 213 2. 213 3. 218 4. 211 5. 213 6. 217 1. 194 2. 196 3. 204 4. 196 5. 204 6. 211 1. 178 2. 183 3. 188 4. 183 5. 195 6. 201 1. 200 2. 204 3. 212 4. 202 5. 205 6. 211

1. Faulty*

CTLS is working

2. 213 3. 235 4. 233 5. 248 6. 242

2

Feb 15, 6:30pm

7.6

1074

1. Faulty*

CTLS is working

2. 232 3. 244 4. 233 5. 239 6. 221

3

Feb 16, 6:30pm

7.5

1090

1. Faulty*

CTLS is working

2. 213 3. 228 4. 221 5. 235 6. 213

4 Feb 17, 7:30pm

7.5

1084

1. Faulty*

CTLS is working

2. 210 3. 222 4. 217 5. 234 6. 211

5 Feb 18, 9:30pm

7.5

1083

1. Faulty*

CTLS is working

2. 228 3. 240 4. 232 5. 240 6. 221

Table 1 Temperature values sensed by CTLS (WIKA) just two months after installation closely represent the true values as cross-verified by an IR camera survey

surface temperature of SRU thermal reactors (reaction furnace). Since 90% of SA SRU units are shrouded (weather- shielded), measuring the surface temperature online becomes challenging. Without the correct monitoring device in place, catastrophic failures could occur, affecting plant throughput. Deployment of this technology aims to detect repetitive refractory failures early by sensing hot spots on the reactor surface, even with the presence of a shroud. Maintenance and shutdown will be planned and timed accordingly. Collaboration between the technology provider, WIKA, and SA began in March 2022 with the installation of the thermocouple on one of Saudi Aramco’s gas plant SRUs. In October 2022, the CTLS installation was completed and successfully tested. The plant continued monitoring the unit, keeping a close eye on the measured skin temperature to confirm continuous and reliable outputs (see Table 1 ). Upon testing performance, the new linear thermocouple tech- nology proved to be working well. The CTLS coils’ peak

Throughput vs burner ∆ P vs reaction temperature vs outer shell temperature

% Acid gas throughput

Burner ∆ p, Hot face (firebrick) Shell outer skin

kPa

temperature, ºC temperature, ºC

25 35 45 55 65 75 85 95

0.8

~ 1000 ~ 1033 ~ 1067 ~ 1100 ~ 1133 ~ 1167 ~ 1200 ~ 1233 ~ 1250

210 ± 15 212 ± 15 216 ± 15 218 ± 15 221 ± 15 225 ± 15 229 ± 15 234 ± 15 238 ± 15

1.07 2.13

3.2 4.3 5.3 6.4 7.5 8.8

100

Table 2

Aramco findings In an effort to resolve technical challenges, Saudi Aramco (SA) piloted a newly developed RDS to monitor the skin

46

PTQ Q1 2024

www.digitalrefining.com

Powered by