cleaner hydrogen grows. And, although Europe accounts for 80% of new projects, China is a rapidly emerging market with more than 50 announced projects. With these investments, green and blue hydrogen production capacity is set to exceed 10 mtpa by 2030. This is, however, far below the demand forecast for 2030, which leaves a considerable need for further projects and investments. Why blue hydrogen has an important role Blue hydrogen is similar to grey hydrogen except that the CO₂ is captured and either utilised or stored underground. Though the amount of CO₂ captured varies according to the project, blue hydrogen is widely regarded as low carbon. Green hydrogen is mostly carbon free and is seen as the ideal solution to satisfy future hydrogen demand. So, why do we need blue hydrogen? The reality is that the current economics of green hydrogen are challenging when compared to blue hydrogen. Even by 2030, it is likely that green hydrogen will be double the cost of blue hydrogen (see Figure 1 ), though cost parity may be achieved by 2045. This will not be the case everywhere. In some regions, particularly those with a high level of grid- connected renewable energy, green hydrogen
6
CO price Fuel cost Operating expenditure Sensitivity Capital expenditure
5
4
3
2
1
0
Green hydrogen
Grey hydrogen
Blue hydrogen
Figure 1 Hydrogen production costs in 2030
and is, according to the IEA, responsible for as much as 900 mtpa of CO₂ emissions. The energy industry cannot, therefore, just expand current grey hydrogen production if it is serious about achieving deep decarbonisation. Instead, it must rapidly transition to cleaner methods of hydrogen production, such as green and blue hydrogen. A global investment of $500 billion has already been committed to low-carbon (blue and green) hydrogen projects through to 2030; this figure is set to rise as demand for
Lower methane slip as SGP operates at high reactor temperatures
Energy suciency Produced steam satises most internal users
Higher operating pressure Hydrogen compression duty and ADIP ULTRA CO capture eciency are improved
To internal users (air separation unit, CO removal unit, triethylene glycol dehydration and power generation)
Superheated steam
Boiler feed water
Saturated steam
Natural gas and/or renery fuel gas
ADIP ULTRA CO removal unit
Syngas euent cooler
Hydrogen compression
SGP reactor
Water gas shift
Hydrogen purication
Hot syngas
Cooled syngas
Impure hydrogen
Hydrogen product
Shift euent
Hydrogen product export
Oxygen
Medium-pressure CO
Air separation unit
INTEGRATED SBHP
CO compression and dehydration
High-pressure CO to storage
Air
Low-pressure CO
Feed exibility: Non-catalytic process means robustness against feed contaminents (sulphur, olens, C ) +
Intermediate ash: High capture pressure means most of the CO can be regenerated at a medium pressure to minimise CO compressor size
Shell propriety technology
Shell technology embedded
Open source technology
Figure 2 The SBHP and the advantages of integration with other technologies
www.decarbonisationtechnology.com
16
Powered by FlippingBook