Input feed
Constraints Operating parameters – temperature, pressure etc. Equipment duties
Optimiser
Individual feedstock rate Individual feed composition Any recycle rate Recycle composition
Iteration i th
Objective function
Plant model output of products/ inputs to AI objective function
Operating parameters Operating parameters – temperature, pressure etc. No. of furnaces online at any point
Prices and costs
User inputs
Optimal output
Market prices of products Cost of inputs
Operating data, LIMS data
Optimal operating conditions and optimised objective Desired product mix Operating parameters – temperature,
APC/MPC
Predictive model
pressure, CV % open etc. Input feed mix volumes Fuel gas consumption
Oine until optimiser
Minimisation of error
Figure 4 A case of live RTO example
validated with real-time and laboratory inputs. It uses predictive plant models and an AI-based optimiser to run iterative scenarios, searching for optimal conditions under varying constraints such as temperature, pressure, and equipment limits. • Input handling: Operational data from distributed control systems (DCS), laboratory information management systems (LIMS), and manual user entries are validated and fed into the plant model. • Hybrid modelling: The plant model uses both first-principles physics and AI-driven data science to simulate product outputs under different operating scenarios. • AI optimisation loop: The AI optimiser evaluates the plant model’s outputs and seeks configurations that maximise profits or yields, considering current market prices and costs, while satisfying constraints. • Automatic setpoint recommendation: After finding optimal targets (for example, product mix, temperatures, pressures, feed rates), the system sends these recommendations to advanced process control (APC/MPC) systems for real-time implementation, continuously minimising error between target and plant operations. AI-driven RTO delivers key business outcomes:
• Profit maximisation: Fine-tuned process control unlocks more value from existing assets without major capital expenditure. • Yield improvement: Optimised product mix and process parameters enable consistently higher yields from varied feedstock. • Energy savings: Reduced waste and smarter energy usage lower the operational cost and carbon footprint. • Bottleneck identification: Continuous optimisation highlights process bottlenecks, supporting debottlenecking strategies and cost- effective expansion decisions. Figure 5 reflects not just the value realised in terms of economic benefits for a $3 billion petrochemical major in India. This use case is also directly relevant to the value of AI adoption in the petrochemical context, demonstrating how advanced optimisation blends engineering expertise and AI to drive measurable operational and financial benefits. Current state of AI adoption in global oil and gas industry While this case of RTO implementation
exemplifies what is possible, such comprehensive, enterprise-scale AI
deployments remain the exception rather than the norm across the global oil and gas industry.
Refining India
13
Powered by FlippingBook