amine flow translates to higher acid gas removal capacity, enabling the refinery to process more crude or sour feedstocks. Reduced pressure drop : The 140 mbar reduction improves pressure economics for downstream units, potentially avoiding costly upgrades. Deferred capital expenditure : By revamping internals rather than building new trains, significant capital savings are realised. Improved energy efficiency : Lower pressure drop can reduce compression requirements and energy consumption in downstream systems. However, these benefits must be weighed against potential risks, including fouling, distributor failure, and increased maintenance complexity. A thorough cost-benefit analysis should be conducted before implementation. Conclusion Retrofitting a trayed amine regenerator with high-performance packing signifies a strategic transformation in the way refineries address capacity limitations and enhance operational efficiency in gas treating systems. As shown in the case study, this type of conversion can result in a 25-30% increase in throughput while also achieving a notable reduction in column pressure drop. These performance enhancements are realised without the need for new vessels or extensive modifications to major equipment, highlighting the effectiveness and practicality of internal upgrades when implemented with precision. However, the success of this approach is not guaranteed by hardware alone. It hinges on the rigour of engineering design and the discipline of operational execution. Packed columns, while efficient, are inherently less forgiving than trayed counterparts. They demand clean feed streams, well-designed liquid and vapour distribution systems, and vigilant monitoring to maintain performance over time. Inadequate filtration, poor distributor design, or lax operational oversight can quickly erode the benefits of packing, leading to fouling, maldistribution, and costly downtime. Therefore, the decision to convert from trays to packing should be based on a comprehensive evaluation that considers not only hydraulic and mass transfer performance, but also the refinery’s capability to manage the operational
requirements of a packed system. This includes making provisions for upstream filtration, ensuring personnel are adequately trained in packed column diagnostics, and establishing rigorous maintenance procedures. When these elements are effectively implemented, packed regenerators can consistently deliver high- quality performance and significantly extend the operational life of existing assets beyond their original design parameters. This approach to retrofitting reflects a growing preference in the industry for intelligent system upgrades rather than capital-intensive construction of new facilities. As environmental regulations become more stringent and profit margins continue to tighten, refineries are increasingly focused on maximising the potential of existing infrastructure. Enhancing internal components, rather than investing in new processing trains, offers a compelling strategy that balances cost, complexity, and returns on investment. Ultimately, the selection between trays and packing is neither a simple choice nor a universally applicable solution. It is a nuanced decision influenced by process conditions, the risk of fouling, operational practices, and long- term strategic goals. Trays provide durability and operational tolerance, while packing offers improved efficiency and a more compact design. As the saying goes, trays accommodate errors, while packing rewards precision. When applied in the proper context and supported by the necessary safeguards, packing can transform a constrained regenerator into a high-performing asset. This enables increased capacity, improved pressure management, and empowers the refinery to respond to evolving demands with confidence and flexibility. The conclusions presented in this article are solely those of the authors and cannot be ascribed to Fluor Corp. and/or any of its subsidiaries.
Debopam Chaudhuri Debopam.Chaudhuri@fluor.com Ayan Dasgupta Ayan.Dasgupta@fluor.com
Vaneet Garg Vaneet.Garg@fluor.com
Refining India
59
Powered by FlippingBook